<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress.com" -->
<urlset xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
	xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"
	xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"
	xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9"
	xmlns:image="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-image/1.1"
	>
<url><loc>https://sundayfringe.org/2026/07/11/who-gets-believed-little-fennels-complaint-at-modern-art-oxford/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>Reviews, views &amp; canapés</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-07-11T10:30:45+00:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Who Gets Believed? — Little Fennel&#8217;s Complaint at Modern Art Oxford</news:title><news:keywords>art, history, modern art oxford, painting, medical humanities, Little Fennel&#039;s Complaint, Unspeak the Chorus, women&#039;s healthcare history, witchcraft and medicine, Olivia Plender, Kira Freije, Richard Napier casebooks, contemporary art review, Oxford art exhibitions, neuroimmune framework, institutional critique, architecture of care, botanical watercolours, Malleus Maleficarum, clinical empathy, Bodleian Library manuscripts, feminist art, social buffering, Glasgow Women&#039;s Library, steel sculpture installation, cognitive reserve, Matt Daw lighting, non-pharmacological recovery, hospital waiting room installation, figurative sculpture, art and wellbeing, history of medicine, Martin Buber, post-TB syndrome, reproductive rights in art, Oxford cultural reviews, tate-modern</news:keywords></news:news><image:image><image:loc>https://sundayfringe.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/07/umanoide-vfgsrgxxxhk-unsplash.jpg?w=113</image:loc></image:image></url></urlset>
